Test conversations, not isolated responses
Agent failures usually happen over multiple turns. Converra runs complete conversations with follow-ups, interruptions, confusion, and handoffs.
Converra tests production AI agents with multi-turn simulations, head-to-head comparisons, regression scenarios, and production verification.
Production proof
The orchestrator stopped fabricating pricing, VAT rules, and infrastructure details — issues users were relying on as fact. Zero occurrences verified across production traffic since Apr 23 deploy.
Mis-routed queries — users landing with the wrong specialist — dropped 74% across production traffic after the Apr 25 deploy. Verified.
Converra generated and tested the fixes; Salespeak's CTO reviewed and applied the winning changes.
A prompt change can look fine in a few manual examples and still break routing, tone, tool calls, or policy behavior in production. AI agent testing needs to measure behavior across realistic conversations, not just single-turn outputs.
Agent failures usually happen over multiple turns. Converra runs complete conversations with follow-ups, interruptions, confusion, and handoffs.
Synthetic personas are derived from real behavior clusters so tests cover the users and edge cases your team actually sees.
Every candidate change runs against the same personas and scenarios as the baseline, making the comparison direct and fair.
Regression scenarios catch changes that fix one failure while silently degrading another flow.
Converra is built for teams that already have agents in production and need a repeatable way to improve them without handing every failure back to engineering.
Use Converra when manual QA is too thin, production A/B testing is too risky, and static evals do not cover how your users actually behave.
How Converra tests agent changes through multi-turn simulated conversations before deployment.
How Converra proves deployed fixes worked with before/after production evidence.
The flagship proof point: routing failures down, hallucinated claims eliminated, no engineering time to generate or test fixes.
How Converra connects evaluation scores to root-cause diagnosis and tested fixes.
Why trace visibility is necessary but not enough to improve production agent behavior.
AI agent testing is behavioral testing for agent systems. Instead of checking one expected output, it measures whether an agent completes the right task across realistic multi-turn conversations.
Static evals are useful, but they miss failures caused by conversation flow, handoffs, user corrections, and accumulated context. Converra uses simulations to test full interactions.
Yes. Converra runs the current agent and candidate change under identical simulated conditions, then deploys only changes that improve the target metric without regressions.